#SAMPLE MOTION TO DISMISS VIRGINIA TRIAL#

Over the last several months, the hair relaxer class action MDL has posted some dramatic growth. Specifically, among women who had gone through menopause – which is most of our law firm’s hair relaxer litigation clients – those who used hair relaxers moderately or heavily had a notably higher chance of uterine cancer. The results showed that women who used hair relaxers a lot (for more than 15 years and at least 5 times a year) had a higher chance of getting uterine cancer compared to women who never used them or used them less often. The study used a special kind of statistical analysis to consider other factors like age that could affect the results. During this time, 347 of these women were diagnosed with uterine cancer. They were looking at whether using chemical hair relaxers affected the chance of getting uterine cancer. In a new study called the Black Women’s Health Study published in December 2023, researchers followed 44,798 Black women who had a uterus from 1997 to 2019. Decem– New Study Confirms What We Have Been Saying Judge Rowland also imposed a deadline of 2/29/24 on the defendants for responding to interrogatories. In the final days of 2023, Judge Rowland partly granted a motion to compel discovery filed by the plaintiffs relating to information about hair care product sold outside the U.S. Janu– MDL Grants Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Any new cases filed post-December 19 are given 45 days to submit a thoroughly completed Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Claimants who filed between July 1 and August 31, 2023, have a 60-day deadline, while those filing from September 1, 2023, until the order date have 120 days. So, it is information for the defendants that provides relatively detailed information about each plaintiff’s injuries related to hair relaxers most notably for this litigation is the specific chemical hair straighteners used.įor those who filed claims by June 30, 2023, the deadline to submit these fact sheets is 45 days from the order. A plaintiff fact sheet in an MDL class action lawsuit is a standardized questionnaire asking individual plaintiffs about their claims and involvement in the case. Judge Rowland issued a case management order on December 19, requiring all plaintiffs to complete Plaintiff Fact Sheets.

But the wheels move slow in MDLs and there is not much that can be done about it.

Would it be better if the trials were in 2024? Absolutely.

#SAMPLE MOTION TO DISMISS VIRGINIA TRIAL#

As we have been telling you, trial dates are key to forcing the defendants to make reasonable settlement offers to women with cancer from hair relaxers. This plan aims to identify representative cases from a large pool, each involving various products and injuries. Janu– Judge Sets Deadline for Plaintiff Fact Sheetsīefore Christmas, a framework was outlined for selecting and processing potential bellwether trials in the hair relaxer lawsuit, with the initial trial proposed for November 3, 2025, and a second one on February 2, 2026. So bookmark this page and come back for the latest information. Our attorneys are committed to keeping our clients and other victims informed. Our law firm has been and will be the leading source of news, updates, and information about hair relaxer lawsuits in this country. Our attorneys also review chemical hair straightener lawsuits involving Optimum Salon and other hair perms and hair straightener products. Revlon (which is in bankruptcy but appears to have good insurance coverage for chemical hair straightener claims).Motions (Strength of Nature Global, LLC).Just for Me (TCB Naturals/Godrej Consumer Products).ORS Olive Oil Hair Relaxer (Namaste, LLC).

Dark & Lovely, Ultra Sheet, etc., (L’Oréal, the most prominent defendant, a company worth nearly $225 billion).Our law firm is concentrating our efforts on the following: Our lawyers are reviewing hair relaxer cancer lawsuits in all 50 states.

Sample motion to dismiss virginia